Compare · procedure

All-on-4
vs All-on-6.

Both are full-arch fixed implant solutions. All-on-4: 4 implants supporting a full-arch bridge with two posterior implants angled to maximise bone use. All-on-6: 6 implants — more support distribution, better long-term prognosis in higher-load patients.

Verdict

The bottom line.

All-on-4 for: most patients, faster recovery, lower cost, sufficient support for normal chewing forces. All-on-6 for: heavy bruxism, large jaw / heavy chewing forces, those requesting maximum redundancy and longer expected implant life.

Side-by-side

All-on-4 vs All-on-6, by the numbers.

All-on-4
All-on-6
Number of implants per arch
4 (2 anterior straight + 2 posterior angled)
6 (4 anterior + 2 posterior)
Surgery timeAll-on-4
2–4 hours per arch
3–5 hours per arch
Cost (China, single arch)All-on-4
$8,000–$14,000
$11,000–$17,000
Cost (China, both jaws)All-on-4
$15,000–$26,000
$20,000–$32,000
Recovery timeAll-on-4
Slightly faster
Slightly longer
Long-term prognosisAll-on-6
Excellent for most patients
Marginally better redundancy
Suitable for bruxism / heavy chewersAll-on-6
Acceptable
Preferred
Bone graft requirementAll-on-4
Lower (angled posterior implants)
Higher (straight implants)
Implant brand optionstie
Straumann, Nobel, Astra (preferred)
Same brands
Same-day immediate-loadtie
Yes (most cases)
Yes (most cases)
Trip durationAll-on-4
7–14 days
10–14 days
Failure rate (single implant)All-on-6
Slightly higher impact if 1 fails
More redundancy if 1 fails

Verdict markers (↑) indicate where the listed option has a clear advantage based on aggregate evidence and pricing as of 2024–2025. Individual cases vary — request a personalized assessment for your specific situation.

FAQ

All-on-4 vs All-on-6, answered.

Is all-on-6 worth the extra cost?
For most patients — no. All-on-4 has 10+ years of evidence (Maló et al, Nobel Biocare protocol) and provides sufficient support for normal chewing forces. All-on-6 makes sense for: documented heavy bruxism (night-grinders), large jaws with high chewing forces, patients who want maximum redundancy if a single implant were ever to fail. The marginal cost adds $3,000–$6,000 per arch.
Is all-on-4 strong enough for normal chewing?
Yes. Multiple long-term studies show all-on-4 supports normal chewing forces with 10-year implant survival rates >95%. The two posterior implants are angled (typically 30–45°) to maximise bone-to-implant contact and distribute occlusal load. For patients without bruxism or extreme chewing demands, all-on-4 is the standard recommendation.
Can I upgrade from all-on-4 to all-on-6 later?
Yes — additional implants can be added later if needed (e.g. if a single all-on-4 implant fails, the remaining 3 can sometimes be augmented with 2 additional implants). Plan ahead: most patients commit to all-on-4 or all-on-6 at the outset based on their specific case.

Need a personalized
recommendation?

The verdict above is general. Send your case and we’ll return a personalized recommendation — destination, hospital, treatment plan and itemized quote — in 5 business days.